Chickasaw vs Jamaican Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jamaican
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Jamaicans
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,646,383 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327 and weighted average of 64.2%, a difference of 0.29%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 48.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 91.0% |
| Range | 60.0% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 67.1% |
| Median | 67.0% | 66.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 62.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 70.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Jamaicans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Micronesia (64.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (64.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Vietnamese (64.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bangladeshi (64.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Honduras (64.2%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
| Ute | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 64.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 53.9 /100 | #172 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 52.5 /100 | #173 | Average 64.3% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 64.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 44.3 /100 | #175 | Average 64.3% |
| Vietnamese | 43.6 /100 | #176 | Average 64.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 42.3 /100 | #177 | Average 64.2% |
| Jamaicans | 40.6 /100 | #178 | Average 64.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 38.2 /100 | #179 | Fair 64.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 35.0 /100 | #180 | Fair 64.2% |