Chickasaw vs Black/African American Family Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Black/African American
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Blacks/African Americans
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
61.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Black/African American Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,332,954 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527 and weighted average of 61.5%, a difference of 4.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Black/African American |
| Minimum | 40.0% | 49.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Range | 60.0% | 19.8% |
| Mean | 67.1% | 60.9% |
| Median | 67.0% | 61.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.2% | 58.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.8% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Indonesian (61.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Kiowa (61.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Cambodian (61.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Cambodians | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Immigrants | France | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 61.3% |
| Ethiopians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 61.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 61.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 61.1% |