Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
83.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
88.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,184,773 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,484,740 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Romania |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 25.0% |
Range | 18.2% | 23.5% |
Mean | 6.1% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Romania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indian (Asian) (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.1%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Western Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.3 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 88.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 88.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 87.6 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
Basques | 86.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |