Chippewa vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Creek
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,212,592 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Creek.
Chippewa vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $74,847, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $78,960, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($46,368 compared to $46,594, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($40,287 compared to $39,648, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($36,631 compared to $35,546, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.1% |
Chippewa vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chippewa vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chippewa vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 77.7% |
Chippewa vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 37.6% |
Chippewa vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chippewa vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chippewa vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 31.5%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.38%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.8% |