Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Latin America
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Latin America
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,392
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
311th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Latin America Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,429,026 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Immigrants from Latin America.
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $51,387, a difference of 9.3%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $75,420, a difference of 6.9%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($86,852 compared to $86,989, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($36,631 compared to $36,823, a difference of 0.53%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $35,307, a difference of 0.87%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $36,823 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $86,989 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $75,420 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $41,049 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $46,941 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $35,307 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Poor $51,387 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $82,166 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $87,219 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $53,265 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.040%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 16.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 21.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 20.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 20.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 20.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 23.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 32.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 55.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 11.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 29.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Tragic 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 33.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Tragic 81.0% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 14.8%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.85%), currently married (43.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 29.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 44.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Tragic 37.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.92%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 89.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 101.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and college, under 1 year (62.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.3%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 3.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 92.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 91.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 90.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 88.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 86.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Tragic 85.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Tragic 50.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 37.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Latin America Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.23%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Immigrants from Latin America |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Tragic 25.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |