Liberian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,386,932 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to an increase of 10.8 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 26.6%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $33,437, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,929 compared to $78,960, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,356 compared to $51,949, a difference of 4.6%), median male earnings ($49,318 compared to $46,594, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $45,371, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 25.1%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and married-couple households (40.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 28.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.6%), master's degree (12.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (34.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.16%), high school diploma (88.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%).