Chippewa vs New Zealander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
New Zealander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
New Zealanders
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
New Zealander Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,118,663 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.989. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in New Zealanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 10.0 New Zealanders.
Chippewa vs New Zealander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $50,575, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $95,146, a difference of 34.9%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $115,230, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,294, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $42,446, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $115,230 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $95,146 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $51,246 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $61,199 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $42,446 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,294 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $105,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $111,286 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $67,333 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and family poverty (11.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.3%), single father poverty (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 19.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Excellent 13.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Good 16.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Poor 13.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 86.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Good 5.3% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Good 75.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Fair 82.6% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.0%), and births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Excellent 30.3% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Good 90.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 56.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 20.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Good 6.5% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 71.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 70.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 51.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Chippewa vs New Zealander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and New Zealander communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | New Zealander |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |