Chippewa vs Norwegian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Norwegian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Norwegians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Norwegian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,533,104 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to a decrease of 98.1 Norwegians.
Chippewa vs Norwegian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $103,682, a difference of 23.5%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $106,144, a difference of 22.2%), and median household income ($70,539 compared to $86,084, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,003 compared to $38,802, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $53,127, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,104, a difference of 13.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Good $44,480 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Excellent $106,144 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Good $86,084 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Good $46,865 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Excellent $55,965 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Poor $38,802 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Exceptional $53,127 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Good $96,866 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Excellent $103,682 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Average $61,104 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 29.0% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 63.9%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 22.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 25.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 84.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 84.4% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.08 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 50.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 29.3% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 3.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 9.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Exceptional 93.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.9%), bachelor's degree (30.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 96.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Exceptional 95.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 94.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 92.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 61.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Average 37.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chippewa vs Norwegian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 30.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.4%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.6%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Norwegian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |