Chippewa vs Mongolian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Mongolian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Mongolians
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mongolian Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,651,003 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.943. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Mongolians.
Chippewa vs Mongolian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $49,173, a difference of 34.2%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $93,971, a difference of 33.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $111,602, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $52,540, a difference of 11.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $65,326, a difference of 21.3%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Exceptional $49,173 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Exceptional $114,553 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Exceptional $93,971 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Exceptional $51,038 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Exceptional $60,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Exceptional $42,542 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Good $52,540 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Exceptional $104,578 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Exceptional $111,602 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Exceptional $65,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Poor 26.6% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 45.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 40.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Excellent 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 105.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 48.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 24.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 52.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.070%), family households (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Fair 46.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 18.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 13.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Tragic 87.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 81.0%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 76.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.22%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Average 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Good 94.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Excellent 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 89.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Exceptional 53.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chippewa vs Mongolian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 64.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.8%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Mongolian |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |