Chippewa vs Sudanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chippewa
Sudanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chippewa
Sudanese
2,429
SOCIAL INDEX
21.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
259th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,867
SOCIAL INDEX
46.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
190th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sudanese Integration in Chippewa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,039,489 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 36.4 Sudanese.
Chippewa vs Sudanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $41,695, a difference of 13.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $93,718, a difference of 11.6%), and median family income ($86,852 compared to $96,783, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $46,982, a difference of 0.070%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $84,401, a difference of 5.5%).
Income Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,631 | Tragic $41,695 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $86,852 | Tragic $96,783 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,539 | Tragic $78,529 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,287 | Tragic $44,419 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,368 | Tragic $51,216 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,003 | Tragic $38,215 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,015 | Tragic $46,982 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,005 | Tragic $84,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $83,943 | Tragic $93,718 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,847 | Tragic $58,281 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty (16.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 11.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 23.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 18.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.0% | Tragic 18.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.4% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.8% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.0% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.0% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 71.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 69.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.1% | Exceptional 68.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.3% | Exceptional 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.8% | Exceptional 42.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.1% | Exceptional 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.3% | Excellent 83.0% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 27.8%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.0%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.98%).
Family Structure Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.1% | Tragic 42.1% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Tragic 43.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 42.6% | Fair 32.4% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.41%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.7% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 53.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.2%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.38%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.70%).
Education Level Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.2% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.7% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Good 47.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.6% | Good 38.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chippewa vs Sudanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 65.6%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (14.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.2%).
Disability Metric | Chippewa | Sudanese |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 14.3% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Good 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.8% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |