Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Oceania
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.30%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 44.6% |
| Range | 48.7% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 16.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |