Aleut vs Immigrants from Australia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Australia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Australia
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Australia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,116,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 9.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 48.6% |
| Range | 48.7% | 47.6% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 13.4% |
| Median | 12.0% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Austrians | 97.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |