Aleut vs Immigrants from Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Immigrants from Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Immigrants from Africa
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Immigrants from Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,810,644 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 14.5%, a difference of 8.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 53.6% |
| Range | 48.7% | 51.7% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 17.4% |
| Median | 12.0% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), White/Caucasian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.5%, a difference of 0.26%), American (14.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |