Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Immigrants from Oceania
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.27%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 10.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 44.6% |
| Range | 98.8% | 33.9% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 16.8% |
| Median | 11.7% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |