Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Canada
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Canada
Immigrants from Oceania
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
59.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,964,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,339,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 8.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Canada | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 3.5% | 10.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 44.6% |
Range | 96.5% | 33.9% |
Mean | 26.2% | 16.8% |
Median | 16.9% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.5% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Zimbabwean (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 97.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.8 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |