Aleut vs Taiwanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Taiwanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Taiwanese
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
56.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
75.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Taiwanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,771,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,695,393 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 48.7% | 31.4% |
| Mean | 16.9% | 12.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.1% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Taiwanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Oceania (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Tsimshian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Germany (13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Yugoslavian (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Samoan (13.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |