Ute vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,117,085 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 59.7 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $65,427, a difference of 23.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $101,580, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($72,402 compared to $86,498, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $51,389, a difference of 5.1%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $37,498, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.5%), and poverty (16.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%), married-couple households (44.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.42, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 51.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 41.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.010%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.30%).