Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,107,367 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.090% in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 89.6 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia.
Ute Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($72,402 compared to $91,541, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $106,109, a difference of 26.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $100,283, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $55,714, a difference of 11.4%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $55,241, a difference of 13.0%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Income
Income MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Average
$43,539
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Excellent
$106,252
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Exceptional
$91,541
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Excellent
$47,671
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Good
$55,241
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Excellent
$40,558
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Exceptional
$55,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$100,283
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Exceptional
$106,109
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Exceptional
$64,089
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
24.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 50.3%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Excellent
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
15.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Excellent
11.1%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.7%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.5%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Excellent
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Poor
35.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Average
82.8%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.4%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.36, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (64.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Exceptional
67.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
29.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Excellent
30.4%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.6%, a difference of 5.3%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
59.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
23.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
8.2%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.1%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.16%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.62%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.3%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
87.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
84.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
36.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
4.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
1.7%

Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 33.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Ute vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Disability
Disability MetricUteImmigrants from South Eastern Asia
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Poor
2.5%