Ute vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,046,134 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 22.4 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 31.6%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $30,644, a difference of 19.6%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $42,357, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $82,821, a difference of 0.80%), median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $35,326, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,503, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 84.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 77.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 169.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 120.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 107.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 56.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.8%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 41.4%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 38.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.7%).