Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,465,848 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 49.3 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,539 compared to $39,826, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,283 compared to $92,385, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($40,558 compared to $37,498, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $54,610, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $65,427, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $101,580, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.1%), receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.79%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.51%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households (67.5% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.3%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.1%).