Ute vs Arab Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Arabs

Fair
Average
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Arab Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,286,288 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Arabs within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Arabs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Arabs.
Ute Integration in Arab Communities

Ute vs Arab Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,651 compared to $45,662, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $104,566, a difference of 24.6%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $106,952, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $51,219, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $40,718, a difference of 16.5%).
Ute vs Arab Income
Income MetricUteArab
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Exceptional
$45,662
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Excellent
$106,952
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Excellent
$88,398
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Exceptional
$48,599
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Exceptional
$57,298
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Excellent
$40,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$51,219
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Excellent
$97,336
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Excellent
$104,566
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Good
$62,266
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Poor
26.6%

Ute vs Arab Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.5%), single female poverty (28.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.8%).
Ute vs Arab Poverty
Poverty MetricUteArab
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Fair
12.7%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Fair
9.2%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Poor
20.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Fair
16.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Fair
16.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
12.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Good
11.5%

Ute vs Arab Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.1%).
Ute vs Arab Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteArab
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.6%

Ute vs Arab Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Ute vs Arab Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteArab
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Good
36.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Poor
82.4%

Ute vs Arab Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.0%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 5.6%).
Ute vs Arab Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteArab
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Exceptional
29.2%

Ute vs Arab Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 44.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.7%).
Ute vs Arab Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteArab
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Average
10.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Ute vs Arab Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 42.5%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.080%), 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Ute vs Arab Education Level
Education Level MetricUteArab
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Excellent
91.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Exceptional
67.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
40.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%

Ute vs Arab Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Arab communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.18%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%).
Ute vs Arab Disability
Disability MetricUteArab
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%