Iroquois vs Samoan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Samoan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Samoans
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Samoan Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,371,514 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to an increase of 77.1 Samoans.
Iroquois vs Samoan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,737 compared to $65,427, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $86,498, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $101,580, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,104 compared to $39,826, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $37,498, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Tragic $39,826 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Fair $100,344 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Good $86,498 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Tragic $44,206 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Tragic $51,389 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Tragic $37,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Exceptional $54,610 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Fair $92,385 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Good $101,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Exceptional $65,427 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Fair 26.0% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Good 8.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Good 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Good 20.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 12.1% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Average 5.4% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Tragic 81.8% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 17.1%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (43.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.78%), currently married (44.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 67.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.42 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Fair 32.6% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 28.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Exceptional 25.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.1%), master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.11%), ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Tragic 31.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Iroquois vs Samoan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Samoan |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 49.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |