Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chickasaw
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,690,693 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.890. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.894% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 894.0 Chickasaw.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $36,475, a difference of 39.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $82,193, a difference of 35.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $77,929, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $44,763, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $53,732, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 39.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 20.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 42.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 53.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 27.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 73.7%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 66.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.11%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 59.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 55.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Chickasaw |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |