Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Chickasaw
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ukrainians
Chickasaw
8,528
SOCIAL INDEX
82.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
66th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chickasaw Integration in Ukrainian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,089,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Ukrainian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ukrainians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ukrainians corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Chickasaw.
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,475 compared to $82,193, a difference of 32.0%), per capita income ($48,014 compared to $36,475, a difference of 31.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,451 compared to $77,929, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.57%), householder income over 65 years ($63,032 compared to $53,732, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,843 compared to $44,763, a difference of 20.3%).
Income Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,014 | Tragic $36,475 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $111,368 | Tragic $85,356 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,456 | Tragic $70,005 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,320 | Tragic $40,672 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,728 | Tragic $47,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,015 | Tragic $34,414 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,843 | Tragic $44,763 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $102,451 | Tragic $77,929 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $108,475 | Tragic $82,193 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $63,032 | Tragic $53,732 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.2% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 39.3%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 15.3%).
Poverty Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 21.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.6% | Tragic 16.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.8% | Tragic 26.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 34.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Unemployment Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.9% | Tragic 62.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.9% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.6%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
Family Households | Fair 64.2% | Good 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.9% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Tragic 36.3% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 13.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.8% | Exceptional 59.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.6% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 50.9%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.7% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.7% | Tragic 60.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.8% | Tragic 53.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.9% | Tragic 30.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Ukrainian vs Chickasaw Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ukrainian and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 50.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 14.1%).
Disability Metric | Ukrainian | Chickasaw |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 15.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.4% | Tragic 51.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.9% |