Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Czechoslovakian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Czechoslovakians
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,983,682 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.331% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 331.4 Czechoslovakians.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $43,806, a difference of 16.2%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,738, a difference of 11.3%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $103,273, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,224, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $60,581, a difference of 6.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Average $43,806 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Average $103,273 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Average $84,965 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Average $46,658 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Good $55,382 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Poor $38,738 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $51,224 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Average $95,070 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Good $101,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Average $60,581 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.2%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.54%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Good 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Fair 13.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Fair 21.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 20.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 64.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 41.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Good 83.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.2%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.21%), family households (62.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Fair 32.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 54.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 95.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Good 65.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Fair 14.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Czechoslovakian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Czechoslovakian |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Good 23.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 46.6% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Average 2.5% |