Sri Lankan vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,443,904 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,093 compared to $70,005, a difference of 33.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,270 compared to $82,193, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $77,929, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($56,136 compared to $47,832, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($40,496 compared to $34,414, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 42.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 41.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.21%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 25.5%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.3% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 79.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.23%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 58.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.5% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.5%).