Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Zimbabweans
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,025,035 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 177.7 Zimbabweans.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $45,804, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $56,302, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $98,586, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.93%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $65,854, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Fair 26.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.14%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.98%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Good 6.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), ged/equivalency (88.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |