Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,980,914 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.879. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.477% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 477.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,522 compared to $97,880, a difference of 7.8%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $47,394, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $57,352, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.34%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $63,643, a difference of 1.0%), and median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $41,527, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.29%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and female poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |