Iraqi vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Iraqi
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Iraqis
Chinese
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,224,189 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 12.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iraqi | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.42% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 50.4% | 57.9% |
Range | 50.0% | 56.4% |
Mean | 13.5% | 11.9% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iraqis by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Morocco (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Portugal (12.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |