Icelander vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Icelander
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Icelanders
Chinese
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,220,666 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 13.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Icelander | Chinese |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
| Range | 90.9% | 56.4% |
| Mean | 37.1% | 11.9% |
| Median | 25.0% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.3% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 46.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.8% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.8% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Serbian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Russian (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Venezuelan (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
| Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |