Immigrants from India vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from India
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from India
Chinese
10.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from India vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 378,048,247 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110 and weighted average of 10.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 6.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from India | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 57.9% |
Range | 21.5% | 56.4% |
Mean | 9.1% | 11.9% |
Median | 9.2% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.4% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from India and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Taiwan (10.3%, a difference of 0.67%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 0.97%), Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), Filipino (10.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and Afghan (10.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.57%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.9%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and Immigrants from Fiji (10.9%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |