Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chinese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chinese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chinese
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chinese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,139,840 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.724 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,746,830 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Chinese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.9% |
Range | 97.8% | 56.4% |
Mean | 14.1% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.8% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 13.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.6% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.4% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Chinese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Vietnam (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Bhutanese (11.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.90%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |