Iraqi vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iraqi
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iraqis
Chinese
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Iraqi Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,233,285 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Iraqi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iraqis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iraqis corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Chinese.
Iraqi vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,466 compared to $77,465, a difference of 28.1%), median household income ($83,753 compared to $98,496, a difference of 17.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,387 compared to $116,156, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.8%), median male earnings ($54,182 compared to $56,872, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($46,140 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Fair $42,760 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Fair $100,658 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,753 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Fair $46,140 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,182 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,666 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,802 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $90,764 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $99,387 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Fair $60,466 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Average 25.9% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 60.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.2%).
Poverty Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Fair 9.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.0% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.8% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 67.7%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and currently married (46.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
Family Households | Average 64.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 21.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.6% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Education Level Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.5% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.5% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 39.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Iraqi vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iraqi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.6% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.64%).
Disability Metric | Iraqi | Chinese |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Average 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |