Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Panama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants from Panama
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.090%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 1.8% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 44.1% | 30.5% |
Range | 42.3% | 27.5% |
Mean | 17.6% | 14.5% |
Median | 16.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Panama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |