Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Immigrants
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
217th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 576,347,863 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.030%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Immigrants |
Minimum | 1.8% | 6.7% |
Maximum | 44.1% | 73.1% |
Range | 42.3% | 66.5% |
Mean | 17.6% | 15.6% |
Median | 16.4% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 16.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Alsatian (14.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |