American vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty
COMPARE
American
Immigrants from Panama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Americans
Immigrants from Panama
14.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,452,032 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Immigrants from Panama |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 92.7% | 30.5% |
Range | 90.0% | 27.5% |
Mean | 23.2% | 14.5% |
Median | 19.4% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 15.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Americans and Immigrants from Panama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Immigrants from Micronesia (14.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Eritrea (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Africa (14.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Nonimmigrants (14.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (14.7%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |