Osage vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Immigrants from Panama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Immigrants from Panama
14.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Immigrants from Panama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,795,919 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,145,499 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 2.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Immigrants from Panama |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 31.5% | 30.5% |
| Range | 29.7% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 14.5% |
| Median | 14.9% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Immigrants from Panama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (14.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (14.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Alaska Native (14.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Ghanaian (14.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and German Russian (14.7%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Americans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.8 /100 | #225 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 14.7% |
| German Russians | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ghanaians | 1.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Nigerians | 1.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 1.4 /100 | #233 | Tragic 14.8% |