Immigrants from Thailand vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Thailand
Subsaharan African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Thailand
Sub-Saharan Africans
14.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Thailand vs Subsaharan African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,905,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,469,907 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.460 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 9.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Thailand | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 44.1% | 69.8% |
| Range | 42.3% | 69.4% |
| Mean | 17.6% | 20.8% |
| Median | 16.4% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 14.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 12.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Thailand by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Japanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 4.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Japanese | 4.1 /100 | #219 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Alsatians | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.43%), Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |