Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
13.8%
POVERTY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,230,350 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 6.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.3% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 37.0% | 35.7% |
Range | 33.7% | 34.7% |
Mean | 15.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 14.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Immigrants from Laos (13.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Fijian (13.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cuban (13.9%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Armenia (13.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and French American Indian (13.9%, a difference of 0.73%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.4% |
Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.5% |
Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.6% |
Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.6% |
Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.9% |
French American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.9% |
Ghanaians | 0.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.9% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |