Central American vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
14.6%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,069,914 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.63%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 62.9% | 35.7% |
Range | 61.2% | 34.7% |
Mean | 17.4% | 16.2% |
Median | 15.0% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.4% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |