Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia
Chickasaw
2.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,279,608 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902 and weighted average of 2.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 63.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.52% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 21.2% |
Range | 26.0% | 18.8% |
Mean | 3.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Saudi Arabia are Asian (2.7%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (2.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Mongolian (2.7%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Africa | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Nicaraguans | 97.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Peruvians | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Central Americans | 97.7 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Afghans | 97.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Argentineans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Asians | 97.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 97.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Mongolians | 97.4 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Colombians | 97.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 97.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 97.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |