Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
14.6%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,967,480 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 0.77%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.1% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 31.4% | 35.7% |
Range | 27.3% | 34.7% |
Mean | 15.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 13.9% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.2% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |