Immigrants from Ghana vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Chickasaw
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,808,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 3.6%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.71% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 40.5% | 35.7% |
| Range | 39.8% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 16.2% |
| Median | 12.2% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Immigrants from Western Africa (14.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Liberian (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Cree (14.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (14.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |