Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Cuba
Chickasaw
68.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Cuba vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,966,420 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 68.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 5.9%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Cuba | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 43.2% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 87.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 44.5% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 69.8% | 67.1% |
| Median | 70.8% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.5% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.2% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Cuba by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cuba are Pueblo (68.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Korean (68.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Chinese (68.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
| Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |