South African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
93.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,784,385 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Minimum | 2.6% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 44.9% | 23.3% |
Range | 42.4% | 23.1% |
Mean | 10.8% | 11.0% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 15.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Soviet Union (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |