Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Subsaharan African
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Sub-Saharan Africans
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 497,613,414 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.745 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 3.3% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.7% | 93.5% |
Mean | 27.0% | 30.6% |
Median | 23.7% | 21.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 19.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 34.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 21.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 20.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Sub-Saharan Africans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Barbados (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from West Indies (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.1% |