Chickasaw vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Israeli
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Israelis
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,424,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 24.6%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Israeli |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 34.4% |
Range | 96.7% | 31.5% |
Mean | 27.0% | 16.1% |
Median | 23.7% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |