Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Subsaharan African
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Sub-Saharan Africans
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,393,739 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125 and weighted average of 23.2%, a difference of 13.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 11.1% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 60.3% |
| Range | 88.9% | 57.5% |
| Mean | 35.8% | 23.6% |
| Median | 30.6% | 22.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.5% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.2% | 26.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 9.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Inupiat (23.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |