Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African No Schooling Completed
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Subsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
No Schooling Completed Comparison
Chickasaw
Sub-Saharan Africans
1.7%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
NO SCHOOLING COMPLETED
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African No Schooling Completed Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,942,262 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.104 and weighted average of 1.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 500,622,971 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with no schooling in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 35.8%.
No Schooling Completed Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.11% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 4.2% | 10.3% |
Range | 4.1% | 9.9% |
Mean | 1.3% | 2.9% |
Median | 1.1% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.57% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.8% |
Similar Demographics by No Schooling Completed
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Lithuania (1.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Netherlands (1.7%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Austria (1.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Canadian (1.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from England (1.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Russians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 1.7% |
New Zealanders | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Serbians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Chickasaw | 99.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Cajuns | 99.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | India | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Zimbabweans | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Cherokee | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by No Schooling Completed
In terms of no schooling completed, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Tohono O'odham (2.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and Sudanese (2.3%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Schooling Completed |
Immigrants | Zaire | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
Tongans | 6.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 6.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 6.4 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
Senegalese | 5.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.7 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 4.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sudanese | 4.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sierra Leoneans | 4.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.3% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 3.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 3.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.3% |