Chickasaw vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Albanian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Albanians
19.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,816,928 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 19.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,811,063 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.382 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 27.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Albanian |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.4% |
Range | 96.7% | 18.7% |
Mean | 27.0% | 12.6% |
Median | 23.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 16.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ecuador (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Belizean (19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), Cherokee (19.7%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Bangladesh (19.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Jamaican (20.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Icelander (15.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (15.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 88.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.5% |
Welsh | 88.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.5% |
Peruvians | 88.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Portuguese | 87.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Icelanders | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Spain | 87.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.6% |
Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 85.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Slavs | 84.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 84.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 83.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 83.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.7% |
Samoans | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.7% |
New Zealanders | 82.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |